With respect to aspect out-of kissbrides.com address close envy, regarding forty worry about-declaration tools was indeed advertised as production of the Notice-Statement and Projective Envy Balances ( Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979 ). Of numerous instruments were used only once. , 1992 ) intended to evaluate gender differences; the fresh Multidimensional Envy Scale ( Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989 ) made to gauge the about three dimensions of envy (intellectual, mental and you can behavioural dimensions); the newest Twitter Envy Size ( Muise, Christofides, & De l’ensemble des ) geared towards comparing the possibilities of an event that creates thoughts from envy people associated with the hobby on the Myspace; the brand new Envy Size ( Buunk, 1997 ), accustomed take a look at three brand of jealousy (reactive, anxious and you can preventive) and the Interpersonal Jealousy Level (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981 ), and this assesses new negative feeling because of real or endangered losings off a loved individual an opponent. Every devices in the above list have indicated adequate quantities of authenticity and you will precision.
Mathes and Severa (1981) expose several degree, plus the basic research did the construction of your own size with 39 facts, that was smaller in order to twenty-eight points immediately after mathematical analysis
Within the Mexico, an effective Multidimensional Measure of Jealousy ( Diaz-Enjoying, Rivera, & Flores, 1989 ) has been elaborated and you can a preliminary studies is actually done with the new Multidimensional Index out-of Intimate Envy ( Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016 ). From inside the Brazil, brand new Close Envy List try modified ( Bueno & Carvalho, 2012 ) As for Colombia, there are no psychometric knowledge away from a certain scale toward personal jealousy. Simultaneously, earlier in the day degree didn’t create Factorial Confirmatory Investigation (CFA) to corroborate brand new basis framework discover, and you will reduced reliability accounts were included in the points (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) otherwise brief examples were utilized (Mota et al., 2016).
In the Latin american perspective, you will find a type inside the Chile of Index regarding Practices of Pair That cause Jealousy ( Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014 )
This new IJS set up for Mathes and Severa (1981) is one of the most used balances having researching personal envy, they discover half dozen items one to evaluate the awareness so you can dangers related to: (a) Partner’s cheating and dating anybody else (facts 1, 3, twelve, fourteen, 15, 16, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you can twenty five); (b) Lover’s prominence (things dos, 3, cuatro, 7, ten, 13, 17, 20, and 23); (c) A keen untrustworthy lover (factors step one, cuatro, 6, 19, and you can 21); (d) Partner’s dated times (things eleven, 24, twenty-six, 27, and you may 28); (e) Partner’s indifference (circumstances 8, nine and 24); and you may (f) Lover’s left household members that have old schedules and sex distinctions (factors 5 and 18).
You will find five degree with checked when it comes to their precision and validity. Subsequently, for the another investigation, IJS was utilized alongside almost every other balances you to definitely analyzed close love-links, low self-esteem, self-respect and you will a random questionnaire off independent identities, confirming, according to theory, the advanced regarding envy, the better the level of Romantic love and also the lesser the independent term of few. Inside research, i declaration an excellent coefficient regarding precision out-of .ninety-five to your overall level. In a third data, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you may Manhood (1982) , so you can stretch the signs regarding authenticity, made use of the IJS and two behavioural actions: (a) hazard when confronted by a competitor and (b) terms from possessiveness into the companion, because of a call that they made to the one who participated in the analysis. The fresh new requested correlations have been obtained, and that again offered the new legitimacy of level. Finally, when you look at the a 4th study, Mathes, Roter and you may Joerger (1982) corroborated the latest convergent legitimacy of IJS along with other balances one to examined close envy.